Right on the Wrong Side!
OK, call me what you will (retrograde, racist, parochial etc), but I simply can’t understand what all the fuss is about being politically correct and all of that. I mean, if I don’t like someone, I now have to think before I let loose a verbal volley if I want to be ‘politically correct’! Hey, I might call him a ‘Paki’ or a ‘fag’! Whoa! Frankly, I don’t give a rat’s ass if someone thinks I am racist or anything like that! Whatever happened to ‘freedom of speech’?
Recently, I cracked one of my very typical parochial jokes and someone called me a racist. Now, that was just laughed off by people because hey, it was a joke cracked at a community that was Indian…just one of those typical jokes y’know. The next day, I called Thierry Henry ‘Monkeyface’ because he looks, acts and behaves like a simian. All of a sudden there were people on my back calling me ‘racist’. Uh? Of course, it did not strike these people as even remotely ironic that they called van Nistelrooy ‘Horseface’. After all, he’s white! Quite frankly, political correctness bewilders me.
It’s even funnier coming in India of course. What with Classifieds advertising for ‘fair, good-looking girls’ and fairness creams ruling the roost. Let’s face it, we Indians are as racist as it gets and let’s also admit that it doesn’t really make a jot of a difference to anything! I mean, just what do I get by being ‘politically correct’?
If I am racist, there’s no way you will make me change my mind by restricting the vocabulary that I am allowed to use in public. If I dislike somebody, my dislike will only be heightened if I am not allowed to speak of it in public. All that will happen is that we generate an entire world of civilized hypocrites. People who are just not allowed to speak about the way they feel.
Personally, I have nothing against someone who doesn’t like me. As a matter of fact, I’d much rather be aware of his feelings than be faced with simmering hatred garbed with a fake smile.
The OJ Simpson judgment was one of the most blatant exhibitions of racism if you ask me. The final line of the defence counsel made certain that the decision was made along racist lines and the defendant was released because of the colour of his skin.
Now, don’t give me all that trash about how certain races were oppressed for thousands of years and how there was so much injustice in the past and how it must be corrected. I for one - and I don’t care if I am alone in this - don’t think that placing censures on the use of certain words and phrases goes even a millimeter in that direction…
Fair enough, words like nigger are not in great taste and I, as much as anyone else, would hardly be inclined to look very kindly upon someone who uses the word, but that’s about all! Racism today has just become one of those catchphrases that has every public figure indulging in a race to look holier-than-thou. Everyone wants to be more anti-racism than the other and it’s all just hypocrisy as just about everybody is racist at the core.
In India alone, there are several laws that are discriminatory (and therefore 'racist') by their very nature, but which it is 'politically incorrect' to speak out against.
1. Reservation is caste-based. It therefore discriminates against those of particular castes as it favours those of other castes.
2. An educational institution run by a religious minority is FORCED to implement 50% reservation for members of that religion, so it discriminates against those of other religions.
3. There is a similar rule for institutions run by a ‘language minority’.
4. There are different Personal Laws for those of different religions.
The list is endless!
The next thing that amazes me is the selective nature of this ‘political correctness’. The rules, it would appear are as follows:
1. Racist jokes are ok if they are aimed at whites, but not at blacks…sorry, African-Americans or even Asians.
2. Jokes about men are alrite, but a joke about women is sexist and is plain trouble.
3. Jokes may easily be cracked at the expense of communities like the Amish, but not against communities that take offence in a violent way. The former are a harmless form of humour while the latter are racist to the extreme.
4. An African-American may crack any type of joke, an Asian may crack an ‘Asian’ joke or one aimed at the ‘whites’, but a ‘white’ may not crack any jokes other than ones aimed at his own community.
5. India-specific: Political leaders, activists and just about any runt on the street can crack a joke about the upper castes, but to even call a person of the lower castes by the name of his caste is a non-bailable offence as per Indian Law.
My question: If I claim to dislike and shun politics, do I get to ignore ‘political correctness’ and get away with being politically incorrect?
Oh and yeah, if you’re one of those that want to tear my guts out for this, here you go: I think you’re a faggot and a Paki and deserve to be consigned to the trash-cans behind a society of lower-caste sweepers! So sue me!

